
MEGA-WATCH
April 2007 Newsletter Number 3
The
The
in
Thomas Linzey, Executive
Director for the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF), and
co-founder of the
CELDF is a nonprofit law firm,
located in
A new organizing strategy is
taught at the
Thomas Linzey is a frequent
lecturer to groups and municipal governments across the
The WCA hopes you will take advantage of this opportunity to attend this thought-provoking presentation.
Thursday, May 3, 8-10 pm: Special program on megafarms, Channel 27.
Thursday, May 10, 7 pm: Sole
Source Aquifer Petition Group Program.
Ryan Dickerson, Geology Masters Candidate at BGSU, will present his
thesis findings: “A modified DRASTIC model for siting CAFOs in Williams County,
Ohio.”
Tuesday, May 15, 6:30 pm: Thomas
Linzey presentation.
Monday, May 21, 7 pm: WCA meeting at Montpelier Public Library. All members welcome.
If you have not renewed your WCA membership for 2007, this will be your last newsletter. We appreciate your support.
Applications for the 2007 Williams County Area Farm Products Directory are due May 21. Forms may be found on the WCA website.
Additional information may be
found at www.williamscountyalliance.com
or send questions to: WCA,
Rural communities have voiced concerns as
family-sized farms are replaced by industrial farming operations. Is this
concern justified?
In 2000, a report, prepared by
Family farms are described as operations where the
“farm household owns and controls the majority of farm production factors,
land, labor, capital, technology, and management,” and “farming is a household
livelihood strategy.”
Industrialized farming does not meet these criteria
and is often characterized by the use of production contracts so that there is
“a division of labor among owners, managers, and labor with different groups of
people assigned to different positions in the production process.”
Approximately 82% of the 56 studies examined, found
that industrialized farming, including large scale concentrated animal feeding
operations (CAFOs), had adverse impacts on community well-being. Overall, the
social science evidence collected from these and other studies supports public,
academic, and government concern about the potential risks of industrialized
farming. Recent research indicates the public’s welfare is at risk in at least
four major areas: socioeconomic well-being, social fabric, the environment,
and regional imbalances in agricultural production.
The report concludes that, “the farming system in place today has been created
from both market forces and government policy and programs. It is thus logical
that government can also be an instrument in changing this system toward
greater public accountability.”
These reports can be found at: www.agribusinessaccountability.org/pdfs/270_Industrialized%20Farming.pdf www.und.nodak.edu/org/ndrural/Lobao%20&%20Stofferahn.pdf

